Milling affects volatile compound recovery in functional mushroom extracts

Fritsch milling equipment is an alternative to uncontrolled milling for sample preparation. Here we show a general method and assay for volatile constituents of functional mushroom extracts can be dramatically affected by milling conditions.

Milling affects volatile compound recovery in functional mushroom extracts

Introduction

Fritsch milling equipment is an alternative to uncontrolled milling for sample preparation. Here we show a general method and assay for volatile constituents of functional mushroom extracts can be dramatically affected by milling conditions.

Hand grinders, food processors, coffee grinders, and other milling methods with limited control settings are standard in laboratories. However, many biomolecules of interest are labile and could be consumed during these processes. Therefore, instruments that provide little control of milling parameters may yield inaccurate results for compound discovery and quantification. We investigated whether particle size, mill time, and blade speed influence analyte recovery and subsequent measurement of compound concentration in functional mushrooms. We used Lion’s Mane (Hericium erinaceus) as the test substrate and a Fritsch P11 bladed mill to precisely control the various milling factors. Using the most abundant components of these mushrooms (leucine, myrcene, alpha-hydroxyisobutyric acid, 2-acetylbutyrolactone, 2-diethylaminoethyl acetate, and mannitol), we monitored their concentration resulting from various milling procedures.

Experimental

Lion’s Mane mushroom extracts were prepared through a simple sample preparation and extraction analytical workflow. Experimental variables were minimized to emphasize differences in milling conditions. The extracts were surveyed by GCMS for compound discovery and quantification.

Sample Preparation

Vacuum-dried whole Lion’s Mane mushrooms were donated by Nammex (Gibsons, BC). Whole, dried, Lion’s Mane mushrooms were weighed, sectioned using a razor, milled using a Fritsch P11 bladed mill, and then run through a 7mm particle filter. Batches of material were milled at various rates programmed into the P11 mill (see milling parameters in Table 1). An aliquot of each batch of milled material was taken for particle size analysis and a separate aliquot was taken for liquid extraction. 

Extraction

Milled Lion’s Mane (1.0g) was weighed into 20mL scintillation vials. The extraction was performed with 20.0 mL of a 1:1 mixture of HPLC grade methanol and deionized water containing 0.5% (v/v%) formic acid (Fisher Optima) at room temperature for 3 hours. The extracts were decanted, and an aliquot was filtered with 0.20 µm Nylon syringe filters into glass vials for analysis.

Table 1. Milling parameters for sample preparation experiments on Lion’s Mane

ConditionsMill Speed (RPM)Mill Time (s)Replicates
Slow-Short2000303
Slow-Mid2000603
Slow-Long2000903
Mid-Short5000303
Fast-Short8000303

GCMS Analysis

The samples were analyzed by GCMS (Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC, 5975 MSD) using an oven ramp program designed to survey a broad range of analytes (Table 2). The injection volume was 1.0 µL and the GC column used was an HP-5ms ultra inert 30 m fused silica column. Suitable compounds were extracted from the GCMS raw data and identified using the Agile 2 peak identification algorithm. Compound fragmentation patterns, extracted ion areas, and retention times were extracted using MS-DIAL and assigned through comparison to our proprietary spectral database.

Results

Figure 1. Molecules recovered from extraction after milling at three different speeds programed into the P11 mill. Mill time fixed at 30 sec.

Figure 2. Molecules recovered from extraction after milling for different time periods. Mill speed fixed at 2000 RPM 

Figure 3.  The top molecules identified at all mill times and speeds. Here we show their concentrations at three mill times at 2000 rpm.

Figure 4.The top molecules identified at all mill times and speeds. Here we show their concentrations at three mill speeds for 30 seconds. 

Conclusions

The experiments above demonstrate that precise control of mill conditions is important in mushroom sample preparation. Lion’s mane mushroom samples were milled with a Fritsch P11 mill set to different parameters of mill speed and time, and then underwent liquid extraction. The analyte composition of the extracts was then identified as shown in figures 1 and 2. Our results show that mill speed and time correspond to changes in mushroom extract analyte composition. We could show that mill settings had a direct influence on analyte recovery from the mushroom (figures 3 and 4). 4-guanidinobutyrate is found in edible mushrooms and is a known fungal metabolite in many species.1,2 Hericium erinaceus is known to have 3.3% of its protein content made up of L-isoleucine.3 Meanwhile, to the best of our knowledge, esculin and Ophiopogonoside A have not yet been described in these mushrooms. Among these compounds, lower mill speeds and shorter mill times corresponded to increased recovery. This indicates a Fritsch P11 mill would allow researchers to optimize their sample prep to ensure the highest yields. 

References

1. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 500, 4-Guanidinobutyric acid. National Center for Biotechnology Information https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4-Guanidinobutyric-acid (2022).

2. Li, J., Wu, H., Wang, L., Huang, Y. & Wang, L. Key taste components in two wild edible Boletus mushrooms using widely targeted metabolomics. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 96, 104268 (2021).

3. Aparicio-Razo, M. & González-Pérez, M. ANALYSIS OF BIOMOLECULES OF THE FUNGUS HERICIUM ERINACEUS THROUGH THE THEORY OF ELECTRON TRANSFER OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PRIMARY AMINO ACIDS. 9, 139–147 (2020).

Supporting

Table 2 

NameAbundance in all experiments
4-guanidinobutanoate5261052.235
L-leucine1110933.091
3-amino-1,2-propanediol425572.75
esculin345937.8184
L-beta-homoleucine326320.0547
tetrahydrofuran272256.9375
dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane270464.666
cadaverine244824.6094
ophiopogonoside A243731.9395
hexazinone240513.2041
citropen223926.4727
4-oxo-3-phenyl-6-propyl-4h-chromen-7-yl acetate195539.752
L-isoleucine183783.2715
dehydroandrographolide181819.543
N,N-dibutylnitrous amide176344.2031
myrcene134515.9443
4-hydroxybenzaldehyde122221.9766
alpha-hydroxyisobutyric acid120649.4336
N,N’-dicyclohexylthiourea112791.6953
2-hydroxybutyric acid94918.07813
2-((7-acetamido-1,2,3-trimethoxy-9-oxo-5,6,7,9-tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalen-10-yl)amino)-n-(4-(5-(methoxymethyl)-1h-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)phenyl)acetamide90886.3457
cyclododecanol86997.33765
6-methoxy-4-methyl-2h-chromen-2-one82209.84376
phenaceturic acid66982.5
1-myristoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (sodium salt) sodium salt66748.45361
1-[(2e,4e)-6,7-dihydroxy-2,4-octadienoyl]prolyl-n-methylvalyl-n2-methylalaninamide62692.64649
butanal54538.58203
pyruvaldehyde53863.91406
2-methylbutyrylglycine53269.54297
cinchonine52899.89649
sinapic acid48724.09424
diffractaic acid44918.83301
l-2,3-diaminopropionic acid38335.02344
[(2r,3r,4s,5r,6s)-3,4,5-tris(acetyloxy)-6-[(7-tert-butyl-5,8-dihydroxy-1,4-dioxo-3-{[(2s,3r,4s,5r,6r)-3,4,5-tris(acetyloxy)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]oxan-2-yl]sulfanyl}-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)sulfanyl]oxan-2-yl]methyl acetate36675.40137
pseudolaric acid  a-o-beta-d-glucopyranoside31419.36426
dl-coniine28856.19677
ganoderol b28060.43164
cyanate25044.28906
allo-threonine23335.97266
4-acetamidobutanoate22061.03906
nerolidol22051.06641
pseudopyronine b21448.30469
dioctyl phthalate21001.31372
daphnetin20752.16382
mannitol19570.46094
protocetraric acid18046.0166
octylamine16933.83765
n-acetyl-b-alanine16850.11523
n-octyl-2-pyrrolidone16671.71484
L-norleucine14774.7041
flucarbazone14044.42285
isoamylamine12573.57324
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate12386.82568
2-amino-3-methylvaleric acid11756.65332
formiminoaspartate11709.78027
1-dodecyl-2-pyrrolidinone11695.82129
sakuranetin11362.86719
3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate11235.17969
1-dodecanamine11142.62036
isocucurbitacin b10466.6709
guanidine10229.51465
lutein9612.479492
benzoic acid9459.237305
lacosamide8988.265625
dimethyl malate8386.848145
1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate monosodium salt5801.692871
norfluoxetin5688.64502
metformin5674.167969
loureirin a5657.355713
trimethylamine5535.165039
mexiletine acetate5474.612305
1-myristoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine5455.387695
norfluoxetine4984.3125
dl-norgestrel3903.630127
aminoadipic acid3554.445068
ethanolamine2852.979736
diisopropyl phthalate2370.876465
4-oxobutanoate1833.481812
1,5-diaminopentane268.3061523
The original article can be found at: Delic Labs

Related Articles

Ever wonder what smoke and vape tests are used for? #AskAnExpert
Ever wonder what smoke and vape tests are used for? #AskAnExpert
As different cannabis products have differing potency levels, knowing the potency of a product is important for determining the correct dosage. Currently, chromatography is used for potency testing of cannabis products. We teamed up with Agilent to show that FTIR spectroscopy can also be used to further enhance these testing processes.

DELIC Labs uses cookies to
ensure you get the best experience
on our website. View our Privacy
Policy for more information.